PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 23.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 60.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
System | Thirdwave Prime Series (all builds) |
Motherboard | ASRock B75M |
Memory | 9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20120523 |
Uptime | 16 Days |
Run Date | Jun 12 '21 at 22:29 |
Run Duration | 168 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
65.4%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Nvidia(10DE 1000) 2GB
CLim: 1402 MHz, MLim: 1626 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
23.5%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 271 273 54 81 51 81 MB/s
|
60.7%
Good
|
|||
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
436GB free
Firmware: JP2OA50E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 107 103 101 103 103 MB/s
|
64.3%
Good
|
|||
Toshiba External USB 3.0 1TB
813GB free, PID d010
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 33 33 33 33 MB/s
|
17.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
49.1%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 16x |
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 13x |
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 7x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 780Nvidia $329Bench 45%, 50,279 samples | 7x |
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples | 5x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 48% - Average | Total price: $700 |