Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	36% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon LE-1640 435 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	38.7% Below average	Memory 71.6 1-Core 27.8 2-Core 35 34% 44.8 Pts	4-Core 38.1 8-Core 37.7 5% 37.9 Pts	64-Core 37.1 2% 37.1 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75 261,163 User benchmarks, average bench 46% XFX(1682 9480) CLim: 1288 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.5.2 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	36% Below average	Lighting 37.7 Reflection 62.3 Parallax 91.6 31% 63.9 fps	MRender 63.4 Gravity 64.7 Splatting 45.7 46% 57.9 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 53%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HDT721032SLA 320GB 606 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 249GB free (System drive) Firmware: ST2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 20 57 46 57 69 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	38.1% Below average	Read 86 Write 51 Mixed 43.8 SusWrite 46.4 42% 56.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 38.1% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	18% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 4.5 16% 5.5 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 4.7 15% 5.4 GB/s	Latency 97.8 41% 97.8 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce G210NvidiaBench 1%, 3,988 samples	3x
GeForce 9200NvidiaBench 1%, 1,231 samples	3x
GeForce 8200NvidiaBench 0%, 1,005 samples	2x

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16