Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 15% Tree trunk	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-6015 APU 129 User benchmarks, average bench 21% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	9.8% Terrible	Memory 12.7 1-Core 21 2-Core 39.9 14% 24.5 Pts	4-Core 40.8 8-Core 35.7 5% 38.2 Pts	64-Core 35.7 2% 35.7 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.8% Great: 31%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 8240 3,521 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 2B58) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.31% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 2.8 Parallax 0.6 1% 1.6 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 1.3 Splatting 2.5 2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.31% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar 256GB SSD 256GB 12,615 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 169GB free (System drive) Firmware: H190117D SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 158 281 274 316 297 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	51.8% Above average	Read 347 Write 313 Mixed 319 SusWrite 271 70% 312 MB/s	4K Read 15.9 4K Write 21.6 4K Mixed 18.7 60% 18.7 MB/s	DQ Read 64.1 DQ Write 57.6 DQ Mixed 62.6 46% 61.4 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 240%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GB 17,809 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10.3% Very poor	MC Read 3.8 MC Write 2.9 MC Mixed 3.5 10% 3.4 GB/s	SC Read 4 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 4.8 11% 3.97 GB/s	Latency 379 11% 379 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
E1-6015 APUAMDBench 21%, 129 samples	1x

GPU
HD 8240AMDBench 1%, 3,521 samples	1x

RAM
HP698650-154-MCN 1x4GBKingstonBench 27%, 306 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16