PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
Graphics | 48.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 90.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds) |
Memory | 13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20200514 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 12 '21 at 15:23 |
Run Duration | 152 Seconds |
Run User | BEL-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
92.8%
Outstanding
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
48.7%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 293 292 291 292 292 MB/s
|
90.4%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$24
214GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 99 100 101 101 100 MB/s
|
59.1%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 218 220 219 220 218 MB/s
|
||||
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$24
11GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 61 60 57 57 56 MB/s
|
48.5%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
49.7%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 652x |
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples | 205x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 169x |
GPU | |
---|---|
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 127x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 114x |
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 111x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 81% - Excellent | Total price: $544 |