Asrock A320M Pro4-F

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock A320M Pro4-F (all builds)
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191216
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Jun 12 '21 at 13:05
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	37%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75 104,122 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	53.6% Above average	Memory 63.3 1-Core 90.1 2-Core 195 64% 116 Pts	4-Core 251 8-Core 273 34% 262 Pts	64-Core 263 16% 263 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 360B) 2GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.11 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	28.1% Poor	Lighting 32.4 Reflection 31.8 Parallax 42.1 26% 35.4 fps	MRender 42.1 Gravity 40.5 Splatting 34.1 31% 38.9 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 15 25 159 38 24 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.2% Below average	Read 243 Write 110 Mixed 120 SusWrite 48.8 29% 130 MB/s	4K Read 19.3 4K Write 27.4 4K Mixed 15.4 64% 20.7 MB/s	DQ Read 26.3 DQ Write 28.2 DQ Mixed 25.2 20% 26.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 85%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 292GB free Firmware: 1AA01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 77 78 77 78 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	41.1% Average	Read 66.3 Write 85.8 Mixed 58.7 SusWrite 76.6 53% 71.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 182% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2400 C15 4x4GB 1,332 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	56.8% Above average	MC Read 21.5 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 22.8 59% 20.8 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 15.1 SC Mixed 17.9 45% 15.7 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 102%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M Pro4-F Builds (Compare 100 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 50%

Yacht

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 47%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock A320M Pro4-F

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	13x
Ryzen 5 3400GAMD $98Bench 68%, 93,718 samples	12x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	9x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	8x
Radeon RX Vega 11 GraphicsAMDBench 16%, 47,368 samples	7x
RTX 3060Nvidia $279Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	7x

SSD
TOSHIBA 256GBKxg6aznv256gBench 176%, 2,259 samples	3x
S700 500GBHP $60Bench 71%, 12,813 samples	3x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	3x

RAM
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples	9x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x4GBCorsairBench 81%, 5,732 samples	7x
HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G3B1 16GBHynixBench 76%, 121 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 103% - Outstanding

Total price: $213

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16