Asrock H570M-ITX/ac

Performance Results


Gaming 52% Yacht	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 51% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	54.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H570M-ITX/ac (all builds)
Memory	11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210111
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 12 '21 at 03:37
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	26%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-11400F-$116 46,609 User benchmarks, average bench 94% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	88.7% Excellent	Memory 85.8 1-Core 148 2-Core 302 96% 178 Pts	4-Core 491 8-Core 877 82% 684 Pts	64-Core 1,210 75% 1,210 Pts
Poor: 88% ↑ This bench: 88.7% Great: 101%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Zotac(19DA 1438) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.27 Performing below potential (44^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	54.9% Above average	Lighting 68.7 Reflection 73.1 Parallax 64.5 56% 68.8 fps	MRender 64.5 Gravity 66.9 Splatting 62.7 53% 64.7 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$29 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03090004 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 42 44 47 9.9 36 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	47.3% Average	Read 395 Write 50.9 Mixed 85.3 SusWrite 34.7 30% 141 MB/s	4K Read 6.4 4K Write 46.4 4K Mixed 33.5 77% 28.8 MB/s	DQ Read 145 DQ Write 17.9 DQ Mixed 9 25% 57.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 47.3% Great: 85%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 22GB free Firmware: SBFKB1D2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 72 152 41 128 41 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Read 252 Write 206 Mixed 323 SusWrite 108 50% 223 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 80.7 4K Mixed 29.9 117% 44.8 MB/s	DQ Read 233 DQ Write 311 DQ Mixed 168 156% 237 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 239,203 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	69.2% Good	MC Read 32.5 MC Write 21.9 MC Mixed 17.8 69% 24.1 GB/s	SC Read 23.6 SC Write 22.5 SC Mixed 21.9 65% 22.7 GB/s	Latency 71.4 56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 111%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H570M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 123%

UFO

Desktop 100%

UFO

Workstation 112%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock H570M-ITX/ac

CPU
Core i5-11400Intel $134Bench 94%, 24,459 samples	76x
Core i5-11400FIntel $116Bench 94%, 46,609 samples	34x
Core i5-10400Intel $130Bench 84%, 71,804 samples	24x

GPU
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	37x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	22x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	19x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $104Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	25x
870 Evo 250GBSamsung $31Bench 101%, 14,082 samples	24x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	14x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	29x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $68Bench 85%, 86,372 samples	11x
Skill Intl F4-3200C16-4GVRB 2x4GBGBench 72%, 106 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 108% - Outstanding

Total price: $623

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16