Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium D 3.20GHz-$100 938 User benchmarks, average bench 31% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	26.4% Poor	Memory 48.6 1-Core 26.5 2-Core 26.6 25% 33.9 Pts	4-Core 25.9 8-Core 39.3 4% 32.6 Pts	64-Core 50.9 3% 50.9 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 360B) 2GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.63 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	28.3% Poor	Lighting 32.3 Reflection 32.7 Parallax 42.4 26% 35.8 fps	MRender 42.9 Gravity 41.7 Splatting 34.6 32% 39.7 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 28%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS900 500GB SSD 16,267 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 385GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS900KA3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 68 82 92 99 102 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.1% Below average	Read 99.6 Write 84 Mixed 97.5 SusWrite 83.6 20% 91.2 MB/s	4K Read 18.2 4K Write 25.9 4K Mixed 22.7 70% 22.3 MB/s	DQ Read 26.7 DQ Write 52.7 DQ Mixed 31.3 26% 36.9 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 96%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 3.2 MC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.37 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 3.6 SC Mixed 4.4 12% 4.17 GB/s	Latency 166 24% 166 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 31%

Sail boat

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium 4 3.00GHzIntelBench 29%, 6,937 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	1x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	1x

RAM
3x2GBUnknownBench 30%, 45,030 samples	1x

Value: 13% - Very poor

Total price: $100

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16