Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive	102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10870H 23,498 User benchmarks, average bench 79% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	94.1% Outstanding	Memory 92.7 1-Core 139 2-Core 267 93% 166 Pts	4-Core 513 8-Core 884 85% 699 Pts	64-Core 1,190 74% 1,190 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 94.1% Great: 92%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GB 14,873 User benchmarks, average bench 136% 28GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXV7101Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 167 165 72 72 74 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 956 Write 207 Mixed 256 SusWrite 121 83% 385 MB/s	4K Read 33.3 4K Write 83.3 4K Mixed 32 136% 49.5 MB/s	DQ Read 474 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 300 231% 323 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 206%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.M4FE 2x8GB 1,143 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (49^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.8% Good	MC Read 24.3 MC Write 24 MC Mixed 17.8 63% 22 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 37.7 SC Mixed 21.7 74% 25.9 GB/s	Latency 62.7 64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 83%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 75%

Battleship

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 71%

Battleship

CPU
Core i7-10870HIntelBench 79%, 23,498 samples	134x

GPU
RTX 3060 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 90%, 102,706 samples	97x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	37x

SSD
SSDPEKNW010T9 1TBIntelBench 216%, 20,963 samples	38x
MZVLQ512HALU-00000 512GBSamsungBench 136%, 14,873 samples	34x
P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBCrucial $45Bench 166%, 55,360 samples	20x

RAM
CT8G4SFRA32A.C8FE 2x8GBCrucialBench 82%, 1,244 samples	35x
M471A2K43DB1-CWE 2x16GBSamsungBench 91%, 15,521 samples	31x
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 68%, 57,752 samples	15x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16