Lenovo 90G90068US

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Lenovo 90G90068US (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 36F7
Memory	8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181001
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 11 '21 at 20:01
Run Duration	179 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR) 15,014 User benchmarks, average bench 27% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	28.5% Poor	Memory 40.1 1-Core 68.1 2-Core 102 40% 70.2 Pts	4-Core 98.3 8-Core 102 13% 100 Pts	64-Core 99.1 6% 99.1 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics 31,419 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Legend(17AA 364F) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.7 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	3.27% Terrible	Lighting 3.8 Reflection 3.8 Parallax 5.7 3% 4.43 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 5.6 4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.27% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$31 14,082 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 82GB free Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 255 345 350 371 362 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	92.7% Outstanding	Read 470 Write 430 Mixed 412 SusWrite 338 93% 413 MB/s	4K Read 36.4 4K Write 60.9 4K Mixed 44.6 145% 47.3 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 154 DQ Mixed 175 132% 178 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 497GB free (System drive) Firmware: CC63 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 107 144 146 160 158 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	88.2% Excellent	Read 168 Write 172 Mixed 80.6 SusWrite 140 102% 140 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 112%
Memorex USB Flash Drive 64GB 563 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 26GB free, PID 7722 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.4 3.3 19 17 19 18 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	20.4% Poor	Read 103 Write 1.5 Mixed 0.3 SusWrite 13.6 23% 29.6 MB/s	4K Read 10.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 1.9 104% 4.13 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 20.4% Great: 26%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CTD TD48G26S819-VC 12GB 2400, 2400 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	21.5% Poor	MC Read 8.4 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 7.4 22% 7.57 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 6.4 18% 6.23 GB/s	Latency 202 20% 202 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 90G90068US Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 90G90068US

CPU
A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR)AMDBench 27%, 15,014 samples	15x

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	13x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	1x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	1x

SSD
870 EVO 500GBSamsung $60Bench 104%, 60,851 samples	2x
SS DSC2KW120H6 120GBIntelBench 69%, 46 samples	1x
SL500 360GBColorfulBench 63%, 92 samples	1x

RAM
RMUA5120ME86H9F-2666 1x4GBRamaxelBench 36%, 576 samples	4x
M378A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 37%, 2,458 samples	3x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 33% - Below average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16