Asus STRIX H270F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics84.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive28.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus STRIX H270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170707
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 11 '21 at 19:46
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 94%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$297
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 36.1
2-Core 39.8
20% 37.9 Pts
4-Core 100
8-Core 335
25% 217 Pts
64-Core 392
26% 392 Pts
Poor: 69% Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,500
Asus(1043 87B3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 466.47
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84.2% Excellent
Lighting 172
Reflection 232
Parallax 253
139% 219 fps
MRender 157
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 145
21% 101 fps
Poor: 190%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 258%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 105 190 125 86 87 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
28.5% Poor
Read 146
Write 162
Mixed 145
SusWrite 114
32% 142 MB/s
4K Read 5.8
4K Write 11.7
4K Mixed 8.1
25% 8.53 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 160
123% 169 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 28.5%
Great: 130%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$135
84GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 107 191 157 102 116 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.7% Below average
Read 144
Write 159
Mixed 162
SusWrite 127
33% 148 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 20.2
4K Mixed 13.1
43% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 201
DQ Mixed 203
157% 215 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 134%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$110
474GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 103 193 160 102 117 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.5% Below average
Read 153
Write 125
Mixed 120
SusWrite 128
30% 132 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 11.1
4K Mixed 6.9
23% 7.87 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 206
156% 210 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 138%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$58
481GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 65 100 97 71 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 105
Write 91.4
Mixed 53.9
SusWrite 79.7
60% 82.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2133 C15 2x16GB-$159
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
51.4% Above average
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 20.4
MC Mixed 20.8
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 6.3
19% 6.53 GB/s
Latency 583
7% 583 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical STRIX H270F GAMING Builds (Compare 2,912 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus STRIX H270F GAMING - $1,431

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $2,294
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $48
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia RTX 3080 $700Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $94SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback