Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics97.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive315% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210521
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 11 '21 at 17:47
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$309
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 78.1
1-Core 133
2-Core 262
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 868
87% 690 Pts
64-Core 1385
93% 1385 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$400
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.3.2
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.5% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 136
Parallax 211
101% 157 fps
MRender 99.3
Gravity 120
Splatting 79.9
94% 99.6 fps
Poor: 97%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 113%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$85
320GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1148 886 891 894 874 858 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
315% Outstanding
Read 2,656
Write 2,589
Mixed 1,902
SusWrite 925
452% 2,018 MB/s
4K Read 69.2
4K Write 181
4K Mixed 98
326% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1261
DQ Write 1,026
DQ Mixed 1,148
858% 1,145 MB/s
Poor: 208%
This bench: 315%
Great: 335%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$39
33GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 136 136 137 137 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 402
Mixed 362
SusWrite 169
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 92.9
4K Mixed 49.6
177% 61.6 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 137
124% 190 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$32
165GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 66 67 65 67 67 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 90
Write 85
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 66
56% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
151% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 70%
WD WD5000AACS-00ZUB0 500GB
52GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 51 51 50 50 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
26.5% Poor
Read 41
Write 38
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 50.7
30% 40.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 51%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$85
104GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 118 117 117 117 118 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 93
Write 108
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 118
71% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.9
195% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 112%
Jmicron Generic 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 0508
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 163 162 164 165 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 160
Write 117
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 162
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
81.1% Excellent
MC Read 31
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 32.4
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 33.1
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 29,699 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $1,073
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $220Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $44
Intel Core i5-11600K $259Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $96SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback