HP ProDesk 400 G1 MT

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP ProDesk 400 G1 MT (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 198E
Memory	1.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180122
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 11 '21 at 11:51
Run Duration	187 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570-$99 129,272 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.7% Very good	Memory 87.4 1-Core 103 2-Core 203 76% 131 Pts	4-Core 367 8-Core 390 50% 378 Pts	64-Core 379 24% 379 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15 230,189 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 198E) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126 Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	3.12% Terrible	Lighting 3.5 Reflection 2.6 Parallax 6.5 3% 4.2 fps	MRender 6.4 Gravity 2.4 Splatting 4.6 4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.12% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 803GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR033 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 118 179 147 300 390 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	Read 433 Write 356 Mixed 321 SusWrite 209 74% 330 MB/s	4K Read 29 4K Write 43.7 4K Mixed 36.9 114% 36.5 MB/s	DQ Read 282 DQ Write 105 DQ Mixed 170 132% 186 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 125%
Samsung Portable SSD T1 240GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 18GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 28 34 33 39 41 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	11.1% Very poor	Read 36.7 Write 37.7 Mixed 37.5 SusWrite 34 8% 36.5 MB/s	4K Read 10.4 4K Write 10.3 4K Mixed 2.3 24% 7.67 MB/s	DQ Read 26.1 DQ Write 9.1 DQ Mixed 20.7 14% 18.6 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 44%
WD Elements 2620 5TB 4,390 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 3.5TB free, PID 2620 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 67 83 77 106 113 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	44.3% Average	Read 110 Write 91 Mixed 24.6 SusWrite 85.2 99% 77.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 44.3% Great: 65%
WD Elements 1TB 51,914 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 693GB free, PID 1078 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 48 62 60 71 74 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	33.2% Below average	Read 97.8 Write 98.5 Mixed 53.2 SusWrite 61.4 102% 77.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 43%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 7GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 11 7.6 8.1 12 9.4 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 23.7 Write 8.4 Mixed 9.9 SusWrite 9.5 15% 12.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.2 79% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C11 2x4GB 463 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	52.3% Above average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 20 MC Mixed 15.8 53% 18.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 14.5 SC Mixed 15 39% 13.5 GB/s	Latency 70.1 57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 71%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ProDesk 400 G1 MT Builds (Compare 1,044 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G1 MT

CPU
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	421x
Core i3-4130Intel $42Bench 52%, 49,509 samples	130x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	106x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	237x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	84x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	69x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	47x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	24x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	20x

RAM
M378B5173DB0-CK0 2x4GBSamsungBench 51%, 14,844 samples	33x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	26x
M378B5173DB0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 7,467 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $142

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16