Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	3.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191119
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Jun 11 '21 at 11:10
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$295 141,122 User benchmarks, average bench 87% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Memory 78.6 1-Core 141 2-Core 274 89% 165 Pts	4-Core 511 8-Core 897 85% 704 Pts	64-Core 1,286 80% 1,286 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Gigabyte(1458 3FC1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.77 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 48.3 Reflection 61 Parallax 40.8 39% 50 fps	Gravity 46.5 Splatting 43.7 40% 45.1 fps
Poor: 80% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 311GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 52 33 51 56 59 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	38.5% Below average	Read 363 Write 33.2 Mixed 49.3 SusWrite 46.9 26% 123 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 29 4K Mixed 16.9 65% 21.5 MB/s	DQ Read 20.4 DQ Write 28.9 DQ Mixed 18.7 16% 22.7 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 121%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50 695,066 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 1TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 129 168 180 184 191 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 5,109 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1TB free, PID 0901 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 139 137 138 137 138 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Read 146 Write 145 Mixed 20 SusWrite 138 146% 112 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.4 35% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 3000 2x8GB 77,202 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.4% Very good	MC Read 28.3 MC Write 22 MC Mixed 29.9 76% 26.7 GB/s	SC Read 19.4 SC Write 20 SC Mixed 21 58% 20.1 GB/s	Latency 83.3 48% 83.3 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 73.4% Great: 104%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING Builds (Compare 4,569 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 184%

UFO

Desktop 104%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-F GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	1,026x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	739x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	560x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	560x
RTX 3080-TiNvidia $660Bench 204%, 155,335 samples	366x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	338x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $106Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	416x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	351x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	227x

RAM
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	218x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GBCorsair $95Bench 95%, 56,114 samples	126x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	109x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $980

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16