| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 86.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 20% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME A320M-A (all builds) |
| Memory | 9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20191014 |
| Uptime | 2 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 11 '21 at 07:22 |
| Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 14% |
PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
88.8%
Excellent
|
90% 166 Pts
|
84% 669 Pts
|
64% 1,039 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.63
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
86.6%
Excellent
|
88% 112 fps
|
84% 105 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
48GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UJ450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 21 50 1.5 2 1.4 MB/s
|
20%
Poor
|
37% 167 MB/s
|
22% 7.1 MB/s
|
10% 14.5 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
285GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 110 112 113 114 118 MB/s
|
77.1%
Very good
|
92% 126 MB/s
|
130% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KLEVV KD48GU880-32A160U 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
74.4%
Very good
|
77% 27.1 GB/s
|
61% 21.4 GB/s
|
44% 91.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME A320M-A Builds (Compare 543 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-A
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 68x |
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 60x |
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 40x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 41x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 38x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 30x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 96% - Outstanding | Total price: $284 |