Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 45% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	56.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR (all builds)
Memory	11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210407
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 11 '21 at 05:28
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$154 383,420 User benchmarks, average bench 96% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	71% Very good	Memory 80.7 1-Core 84.7 2-Core 180 66% 115 Pts	4-Core 330 8-Core 597 56% 464 Pts	64-Core 1,084 67% 1,084 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 107%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Asus(1043 85B6) CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 2352 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.77 Performing below potential (59^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	56.3% Above average	Lighting 75.6 Reflection 79.1 Parallax 73 62% 75.9 fps	MRender 63.5 Gravity 55.6 Splatting 52 46% 57 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 2 249GB 102 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: 9.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 239 249 272 245 258 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	42.5% Average	Read 362 Write 335 Mixed 352 SusWrite 247 73% 324 MB/s	4K Read 10.7 4K Write 10.9 4K Mixed 8.7 33% 10.1 MB/s	DQ Read 55.1 DQ Write 71.5 DQ Mixed 61.1 47% 62.6 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 159%
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB 1,574 User benchmarks, average bench 136% 1TB free Firmware: 9.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 156 160 159 163 162 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	96.1% Outstanding	Read 176 Write 115 Mixed 62.7 SusWrite 158 93% 128 MB/s	4K Read 2.3 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.3 285% 2 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 96.1% Great: 212%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 13,232 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	86.1% Excellent	MC Read 38.6 MC Write 23.8 MC Mixed 33 91% 31.8 GB/s	SC Read 19.2 SC Write 19.4 SC Mixed 28.5 64% 22.4 GB/s	Latency 79.2 50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR Builds (Compare 821 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 142%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS_BR

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $154Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	157x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	148x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $201Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	114x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	110x
RTX 3060Nvidia $270Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	66x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	52x

SSD
SPECTRIX S40G 512GBXPGBench 209%, 26,235 samples	31x
GAMMIX S41 1TBXPGBench 257%, 856 samples	21x
SNVS500G 500GBKingstonBench 186%, 34,043 samples	19x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples	37x
DDR4 3600 2x8GBAdataBench 95%, 15,812 samples	25x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 2x8GBTeamBench 82%, 22,274 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $554

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16