Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte AX370-Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming-CF  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170619
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 11 '21 at 02:55
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 64.3
1-Core 111
2-Core 222
72% 132 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 698
66% 549 Pts
64-Core 1,081
67% 1,081 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.4.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16.3% Very poor
Lighting 0.1
Reflection 61.8
Parallax 87.3
0% 49.7 fps
MRender 63.8
Gravity 70.3
Splatting 45.8
48% 60 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$135
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35500WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 215 210 209 211 211 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 796
Write 361
Mixed 350
SusWrite 212
95% 430 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 81.2
4K Mixed 33.3
138% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 551
DQ Write 511
DQ Mixed 389
331% 484 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 110%
Great: 144%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
2TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 140 131 144 160 154 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 177
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 140
94% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
91% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 108%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB
10GB free, PID a81d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
6.61% Terrible
Read 19.1
Write 6.5
Mixed 7.7
SusWrite 10.8
13% 11 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.61%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
58.1% Above average
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 20.3
60% 20.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 17.1
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 356 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $528
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback