Monster TULPAR T7 V20.3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive270% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemMonster TULPAR T7 V20.3  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER TULPAR T7 V20.3
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210305
Uptime4.4 Days
Run DateJun 11 '21 at 00:42
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10875H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Memory 93.8
1-Core 142
2-Core 270
94% 169 Pts
4-Core 518
8-Core 848
84% 683 Pts
64-Core 1,152
71% 1,152 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 92%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNW010T9 1TB
614GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1489 1501 1491 1522 1528 1428 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
270% Outstanding
Read 1,671
Write 1,532
Mixed 1,148
SusWrite 1,493
329% 1,461 MB/s
4K Read 55.8
4K Write 119
4K Mixed 71.1
239% 82 MB/s
DQ Read 838
DQ Write 876
DQ Mixed 605
525% 773 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 270%
Great: 295%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.6% Above average
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 14.4
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 20.5
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 60.3
66% 60.3 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TULPAR T7 V20.3 Builds (Compare 596 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser

System: Monster TULPAR T7 V20.3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback