Gigabyte H370 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics56.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemGigabyte H370AORUSGAMING3WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte H370 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180917
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateJun 10 '21 at 18:55
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$320
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Memory 91.4
1-Core 135
2-Core 254
92% 160 Pts
4-Core 516
8-Core 828
85% 672 Pts
64-Core 1,039
70% 1,039 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$290
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.63
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.8% Above average
Lighting 69
Reflection 75.9
Parallax 77.4
56% 74.1 fps
MRender 67.4
Gravity 72.6
Splatting 70.3
58% 70.1 fps
Poor: 52%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 61%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE2500PNC 250GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 73 55 64 62 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 403
Write 186
Mixed 160
SusWrite 75.2
45% 206 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 24.4
97% 34.2 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 258
197% 272 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 106%
WD WD1600JS-75NCB1 160GB
66GB free
Firmware: 10.02E02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 47 46 45 47 45 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
28.1% Poor
Read 51.6
Write 46.9
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 45.9
34% 45.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 35%
Hitachi HTS541640J9SA00 40GB
14GB free
Firmware: SB1OC74P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 25 26 26 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Read 28.2
Write 30.6
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 25.7
19% 26.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown F4-2666C19-8GIS 04CD F4-2400C15-8GIS 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.3% Average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 11.2
37% 12.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 14.4
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical GA-H370 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 2,897 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte H370 AORUS GAMING 3 WIFI - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $959
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $72G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback