Asus Z97M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive201% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus Z97M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 10 '21 at 18:37
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Memory 91.3
1-Core 126
2-Core 253
88% 157 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 657
72% 571 Pts
64-Core 643
40% 643 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 361C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Lighting 31.8
Reflection 33.2
Parallax 40.8
26% 35.3 fps
MRender 42.9
Gravity 40.8
Splatting 34.4
32% 39.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158
778GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 607 651 624 626 629 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
201% Outstanding
Read 1,133
Write 1,020
Mixed 1,019
SusWrite 598
212% 942 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 86.5
267% 95.9 MB/s
DQ Read 826
DQ Write 749
DQ Mixed 778
586% 784 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 201%
Great: 372%
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GB
449GB free
Firmware: EXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 560 593 560 557 564 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
165% Outstanding
Read 667
Write 592
Mixed 601
SusWrite 542
135% 601 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 71.6
232% 83 MB/s
DQ Read 776
DQ Write 680
DQ Mixed 828
593% 761 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 165%
Great: 295%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 16GB
7GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 13 13 12 13 13 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
23.1% Poor
Read 110
Write 42.4
Mixed 26.9
SusWrite 13.2
51% 48.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.8
116% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 23.1%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
62.1% Good
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 18.4
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 18.2
SC Write 24.3
SC Mixed 22.1
62% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 65.2
61% 65.2 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,031 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97M-PLUS - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $998
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback