Gigabyte GA-H61MA-D3V

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H61MA-D3V (all builds)
Memory	8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140225
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jun 10 '21 at 16:16
Run Duration	240 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	75.6% Very good	Memory 87.3 1-Core 96.6 2-Core 192 73% 125 Pts	4-Core 370 8-Core 372 50% 371 Pts	64-Core 377 23% 377 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% MSI(1462 8A90) ≥ 4GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	3.41% Terrible	Lighting 4.2 Reflection 4.2 Parallax 1.9 3% 3.43 fps	MRender 4.3 Gravity 4.7 Splatting 3.6 3% 4.2 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.41% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 144GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 101 4 12 38 29 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	36.7% Below average	Read 306 Write 188 Mixed 205 SusWrite 51.6 42% 187 MB/s	4K Read 17.4 4K Write 25.7 4K Mixed 14.7 59% 19.3 MB/s	DQ Read 93.1 DQ Write 63.6 DQ Mixed 23.9 32% 60.2 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130 20,479 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 274GB free Firmware: CC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 117 120 120 120 123 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	67.3% Good	Read 114 Write 113 Mixed 56.4 SusWrite 120 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 69%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 161GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 45 44 45 45 45 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	25.6% Poor	Read 44 Write 46.9 Mixed 40.2 SusWrite 44.8 33% 44 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 25.6% Great: 63%
WD Green 1.5TB (2011)-$51 6,566 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 100GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 60 62 65 65 64 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	35.1% Below average	Read 59.8 Write 59.3 Mixed 54.4 SusWrite 62.2 44% 58.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 126% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 65%
Seagate M3 2TB 1,454 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 158GB free Firmware: 0707 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 27 27 28 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	15.4% Very poor	Read 25.3 Write 26.7 Mixed 22.1 SusWrite 27.1 19% 25.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 0.6 182% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 67%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 60,540 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 140GB free Firmware: 0707 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Read 29.2 Write 27.6 Mixed 26 SusWrite 19.5 19% 25.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 0.5 161% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 66%
Seagate M3 Portable 2TB 615 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 131GB free, PID 61b5 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 103 114 114 114 113 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	38.4% Below average	Read 44.4 Write 94.4 Mixed 89.4 SusWrite 110 126% 84.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.5 108% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 53%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 12,078 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 53GB free, PID 0900 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 16 16 17 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	24% Poor	Read 31.3 Write 24.4 Mixed 21.4 SusWrite 16.6 30% 23.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 0.4 190% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 52%
Intenso External USB 3.0 4TB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1.5TB free, PID 0579 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 105 106 104 106 104 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	60.9% Good	Read 114 Write 98.4 Mixed 73.4 SusWrite 105 130% 97.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 6.9 4K Mixed 0.8 267% 3.03 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 60.9% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-037.A00LF BKH400UD25608-1333 12GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	48.8% Average	MC Read 17.8 MC Write 17.5 MC Mixed 14.8 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 13.9 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 70.2 57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H61MA-D3V Builds (Compare 246 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61MA-D3V - $160

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	45x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	23x
Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples	16x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	18x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	15x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	13x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	8x
PLUS 480GBSandiskBench 48%, 58,990 samples	7x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	7x
M378B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 5,657 samples	6x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $247

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16