Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	10.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	19.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E31260L 310 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	53.1% Above average	Memory 74.3 1-Core 62.5 2-Core 102 50% 79.6 Pts	4-Core 174 8-Core 257 27% 215 Pts	64-Core 305 19% 305 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 53.1% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170 16,214 User benchmarks, average bench 11% HP(103C 1098) 2GB CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 457.49 Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Lighting 13.2 Reflection 16 Parallax 11.1 11% 13.4 fps	MRender 11 Gravity 13.6 Splatting 14.5 11% 13 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 11%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Colorful SL300 160GB 355 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 114GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0616B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 110 82 73 67 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	19.4% Very poor	Read 319 Write 267 Mixed 12.5 SusWrite 98 38% 174 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 2% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 19.4% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	26.2% Poor	MC Read 9.2 MC Write 8.5 MC Mixed 8.1 25% 8.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.1 SC Write 8.1 SC Mixed 7.4 22% 7.53 GB/s	Latency 91.7 44% 91.7 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 26.2% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16