Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	48.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX504GM
Memory	9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200619
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 10 '21 at 12:28
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	THA-User
Background CPU	6%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8750H 442,631 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	Memory 72.3 1-Core 53.3 2-Core 107 48% 77.5 Pts	4-Core 210 8-Core 326 33% 268 Pts	64-Core 418 26% 418 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Asus(1043 1391) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 27.21.14.6663 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.5% Average	Lighting 58.2 Reflection 99.7 Parallax 60.4 47% 72.8 fps	MRender 67.1 Gravity 58.9 Splatting 60.5 51% 62.2 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48.5% Great: 52%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GB 18,233 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: E8FK11.C SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 25 30 36 42 49 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	63.4% Good	Read 474 Write 371 Mixed 448 SusWrite 64.1 76% 339 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 40.2 4K Mixed 25.3 86% 28.9 MB/s	DQ Read 334 DQ Write 287 DQ Mixed 287 222% 303 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 63.4% Great: 115%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB 294,991 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 478GB free Firmware: 04.01A04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 77 76 79 79 77 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	53.3% Above average	Read 107 Write 90.1 Mixed 65.1 SusWrite 77.7 63% 85 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 0.8 212% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 79%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK Transcend JM2666HSB-8G 16GB 157 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2667, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	65.2% Good	MC Read 25.6 MC Write 25.7 MC Mixed 22.4 70% 24.6 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 17.8 SC Mixed 15 41% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 96.2 42% 96.2 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM Builds (Compare 1,211 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Sail boat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 30%

Sail boat

System: Asus TUF GAMING FX504GM_FX80GM

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	730x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	481x

GPU
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples	634x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	576x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	1x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 96%, 18,615 samples	218x
Micron_1100_MTFDDAV256TBN 256GBBench 72%, 50,765 samples	199x
RBUSNS8154P3128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 81%, 18,233 samples	172x

RAM
HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 1x8GBHynixBench 40%, 73,050 samples	234x
HMA82GS6CJR8N-VK 1x16GBHynixBench 44%, 33,430 samples	173x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	86x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16