Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 2950M 360 User benchmarks, average bench 46% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	Memory 82.1 1-Core 41.9 2-Core 117 50% 80.4 Pts	4-Core 113 8-Core 107 15% 110 Pts	64-Core 115 7% 115 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz) 43,454 User benchmarks, average bench 2% MSI(1462 10E9) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.67% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 3.3 2% 2.23 fps	MRender 3.5 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 2.4 2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.67% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
120gb SSD 120GB 3,247 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 30 89 105 73 73 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	63.1% Good	Read 446 Write 335 Mixed 318 SusWrite 88.3 66% 297 MB/s	4K Read 31.1 4K Write 62.1 4K Mixed 23.3 110% 38.8 MB/s	DQ Read 122 DQ Write 198 DQ Mixed 35.5 62% 118 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 63.1% Great: 80%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston MSI16D3LS1KBG/4G 1x4GB 133 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	31.9% Below average	MC Read 10.7 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 9.2 30% 10.3 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 9.5 28% 9.77 GB/s	Latency 76.7 52% 76.7 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	250x
GeForce 820MNvidiaBench 4%, 9,266 samples	25x
GeForce GT 740MNvidiaBench 6%, 15,605 samples	21x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x
Solid State Disk 120GBSpccBench 59%, 22,489 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x

RAM
MSI16D3LS1MNG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 29%, 6,146 samples	37x
M2S8G64CC8HB5N-DI 1x8GBNanyaBench 29%, 1,618 samples	35x
MSI16D3LS1KBG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 29%, 3,484 samples	22x

Value: 13% - Very poor

Total price: $100

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16