Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics59.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory44.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime12.3 Days
Run DateJun 09 '21 at 21:27
Run Duration264 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
91.8% Outstanding
Memory 79.1
1-Core 140
2-Core 282
90% 167 Pts
4-Core 559
8-Core 1,071
97% 815 Pts
64-Core 2,090
129% 2,090 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 461.09
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.4% Above average
Lighting 73
Reflection 80.7
Parallax 74.8
60% 76.2 fps
MRender 73.3
Gravity 71.4
Splatting 72.2
59% 72.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2404
Write 2,095
Mixed 1,356
433% 1,952 MB/s
4K Read 48.8
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 68.6
248% 93.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1234
DQ Write 987
DQ Mixed 1,043
799% 1,088 MB/s
Poor: 274% Great: 488%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
216GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 440 440 440 429 417 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 439
Mixed 447
SusWrite 434
102% 452 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 90.5
4K Mixed 54.2
178% 61.6 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 201
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 111%
Great: 133%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
154GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 440 440 425 409 412 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 502
Write 445
Mixed 441
SusWrite 428
102% 454 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 87.9
4K Mixed 53.1
175% 60.2 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 200
151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 110%
Great: 133%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
9GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 62.2
Write 434
Mixed 78.9
44% 192 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 78.8
4K Mixed 44.1
153% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 134
119% 180 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
407GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 198 202 202 202 201 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 144
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 198
112% 154 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
146% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 110%
Great: 112%
Kingston HyperX Savage USB 3.1 256GB-$126
15GB free, PID 16b3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 40 41 41 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 36
Write 37.9
Mixed 32
SusWrite 39.9
50% 36.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.9
59% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 43.1
MC Write 35.9
MC Mixed 37.4
111% 38.8 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 33.3
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 104%
Great: 189%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,829 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $940
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback