Performance Results


Gaming 167% UFO	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 147% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	195% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	291% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS ELITE
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF (all builds)
Memory	22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190314
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Jun 09 '21 at 15:56
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	86.5% Excellent	Memory 91.3 1-Core 129 2-Core 254 88% 158 Pts	4-Core 440 8-Core 656 68% 548 Pts	64-Core 889 55% 889 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 86.5% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,306 158,856 User benchmarks, average bench 210% Asus(1043 87D9) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 466.63 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	195% Outstanding	Lighting 288 Reflection 250 Parallax 300 235% 279 fps	MRender 314 Gravity 231 Splatting 164 185% 237 fps
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 195% Great: 230%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDS100T1X0E-00AFY0 1TB 44,185 User benchmarks, average bench 430% 233GB free (System drive) Firmware: 613000WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 1472 1694 1824 1337 1402 1364 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	291% Outstanding	Read 2,082 Write 1383 Mixed 1,676 SusWrite 1,515 373% 1,664 MB/s	4K Read 48.9 4K Write 118 4K Mixed 65.4 220% 77.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1261 DQ Write 834 DQ Mixed 998 758% 1031 MB/s
Poor: 264% ↑ This bench: 291% Great: 573%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 273GB free Firmware: RVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 346 269 81 81 83 82 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	76.7% Very good	Read 459 Write 432 Mixed 365 SusWrite 157 79% 353 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 73.2 4K Mixed 26.3 111% 41.6 MB/s	DQ Read 360 DQ Write 328 DQ Mixed 343 257% 344 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 121%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38 237,487 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 301GB free Firmware: SBFK61K1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 16 57 73 15 93 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	4.44% Terrible	Read 7.7 Write 30.2 Mixed 25.4 SusWrite 52.3 7% 28.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 0.2 3% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 4.44% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GB 92,358 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	88.2% Excellent	MC Read 32.2 MC Write 37.4 MC Mixed 28.3 93% 32.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 30.3 SC Mixed 19.8 61% 21.3 GB/s	Latency 65.3 61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 114%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 144%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 132%

UFO

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	510x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	483x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	453x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	375x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	307x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	226x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	207x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	192x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	158x

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $787

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16