| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 4.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H110M-DVS R3.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20160914 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 09 '21 at 15:45 |
| Run Duration | 121 Seconds |
| Run User | BLR-User |
| Background CPU | 17% |
PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
62.9%
Good
|
78% 136 Pts
|
28% 212 Pts
|
13% 212 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce 9600 GT
Device(0000 0000) 512MB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593
|
4.06%
Terrible
|
4% 5.8 fps
|
4% 5.17 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
877GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 174 179 180 182 184 MB/s
|
90.6%
Outstanding
|
94% 129 MB/s
|
120% 0.73 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CT4G4DFS8213.C8FBR2 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
70.6%
Very good
|
71% 24.9 GB/s
|
61% 21.3 GB/s
|
59% 67.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-DVS R3.0 Builds (Compare 878 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H110M-DVS R3.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 172x |
| Pentium G4560Intel $31Bench 57%, 70,054 samples | 165x |
| Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 83x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 145x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 61x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 52x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 84% - Excellent | Total price: $197 |