bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Motherboard H61H2-TM7
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130708
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateJun 09 '21 at 10:47
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 95.4
2-Core 185
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 353
48% 355 Pts
64-Core 356
22% 356 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
PwrHis(1787 D570) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1264 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.1
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.1% Average
Lighting 56.4
Reflection 59.8
Parallax 76.7
46% 64.3 fps
MRender 59.9
Gravity 59.3
Splatting 43.7
43% 54.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF2204RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 117 86 87 84 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 322
Write 286
Mixed 222
SusWrite 112
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 17.4
4K Write 25.1
4K Mixed 12.1
55% 18.2 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 87.3
DQ Mixed 32.6
42% 75.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 56%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42
275GB free
Firmware: CP100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 81 81 81 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
40.1% Average
Read 58.3
Write 34.6
Mixed 43.2
SusWrite 81.1
40% 54.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 43%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$22
92GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 87 89 89 89 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Read 89
Write 87.5
Mixed 47.6
SusWrite 88.6
57% 78.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
135% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 88%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
7GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 8.7 8.6 8.6 7.9 8.5 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 23.6
Write 5.5
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 8.2
12% 11 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 2.4
158% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 M378B5273DH0-CH9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
51.8% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.4
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,212 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback