| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 61% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Micro-Star GS75 Stealth 9SF |
| Motherboard | MSI MS-17G1 (all builds) |
| Memory | 8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190326 |
| Uptime | 1.9 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 09 '21 at 06:44 |
| Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 32% |
PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
75.6%
Very good
|
78% 139 Pts
|
59% 474 Pts
|
44% 708 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)
MSI(1462 1277) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
61%
Good
|
60% 77.8 fps
|
63% 77.4 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston MSI26D4S9S8ME-8 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
54.2%
Above average
|
55% 19.4 GB/s
|
40% 13.9 GB/s
|
51% 77.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical MS-17G1 Builds (Compare 968 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI MS-17G1
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples | 612x |
| Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples | 247x |
| Core i9-9880HIntelBench 79%, 11,095 samples | 106x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples | 405x |
| RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples | 290x |
| RTX 2080 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 90%, 7,789 samples | 138x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |