Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 08 '21 at 21:46
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 95.6
1-Core 150
2-Core 299
100% 181 Pts
4-Core 583
8-Core 1,142
102% 862 Pts
64-Core 1,143
71% 1,143 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 102%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,368
Write 2,275
Mixed 1,458
452% 2034 MB/s
4K Read 56.9
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 78.8
258% 90.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,647
DQ Write 1,375
DQ Mixed 1,474
1,114% 1,499 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
695GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 179 181 180 180 181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 195
Write 190
Mixed 83.4
SusWrite 177
118% 161 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 107%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 3000 C15 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 36.4
MC Mixed 27.3
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 28.3
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 55.3
72% 55.3 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 7,441 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $787
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback