Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4170-$59 48,178 User benchmarks, average bench 57% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	70.7% Very good	Memory 90.9 1-Core 108 2-Core 179 75% 126 Pts	4-Core 294 8-Core 295 39% 294 Pts	64-Core 292 18% 292 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 70.7% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% MSI(1462 8A9F) 2GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 405 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.23% Terrible	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 6 Parallax 1.3 0% 2.47 fps	MRender 5.5 Gravity 4.3 Splatting 3.3 4% 4.37 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 1.23% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 429GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS1OA750 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 4.7 3% 4.7 MB/s	4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 103%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 15,101 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 157GB free, PID a200 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 94 93 95 94 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	39.5% Below average	Read 92 Write 91.6 Mixed 34.1 SusWrite 93.9 104% 77.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.5 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5474-041.A00LF 8GB 85 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	51.4% Above average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 18.3 MC Mixed 15.7 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 19.3 SC Mixed 16.6 48% 16.7 GB/s	Latency 65.9 61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	252x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	143x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	76x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 37,489 samples	26x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	26x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	22x

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $290

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16