HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 2 months ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 1 month ago, 14 days ago, 14 days ago, 13 days ago, 12 days ago, 12 days ago, 12 days ago, 11 days ago, 11 days ago, 2 days ago, 2 days ago, 2 days ago, 2 days ago, 1 day ago, 1 day ago, 21 hrs ago, 20 hrs ago, 20 hrs ago, 20 hrs ago, 20 hrs ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8393
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190418
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 08 '21 at 14:57
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 106
2-Core 201
79% 133 Pts
4-Core 364
8-Core 486
56% 425 Pts
64-Core 480
32% 480 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
HP(103C 8393) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2102 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.63
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.1% Below average
Lighting 38.6
Reflection 116
Parallax 57.6
31% 70.7 fps
MRender 33.1
Gravity 54.9
Splatting 74.4
42% 54.1 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 81%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5256GPUK NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5KHA4102 Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 240 239 232 240 234 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 690
Write 378
Mixed 316
SusWrite 231
89% 404 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 43
156% 59.7 MB/s
DQ Read 778
DQ Write 88.2
DQ Mixed 91.4
154% 319 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 109%
Great: 147%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
119GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3T0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 84 87 89 88 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 134
Write 120
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 86.6
68% 93.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 76%
ADATA HD710 1TB
170GB free, PID a15a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 39 39 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Read 36.9
Write 34.9
Mixed 23.1
SusWrite 37.6
44% 33.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
75.9% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 28.9
MC Mixed 22.7
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 28.4
SC Mixed 23
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx Builds (Compare 2,188 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 17-an0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $30
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $320Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $95SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback