Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	64.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4320 Quad-Core 2,134 User benchmarks, average bench 57% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	56.3% Above average	Memory 81.6 1-Core 68.5 2-Core 119 56% 89.8 Pts	4-Core 176 8-Core 210 25% 193 Pts	64-Core 209 13% 209 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 64%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 71GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3K87RA SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 151 101 85 49 119 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	64.2% Good	Read 425 Write 381 Mixed 300 SusWrite 137 69% 311 MB/s	4K Read 21.3 4K Write 43.1 4K Mixed 27.6 90% 30.7 MB/s	DQ Read 253 DQ Write 226 DQ Mixed 162 143% 214 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 88%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$40 52,322 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 350GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 103 103 103 101 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	42.6% Average	Read 46.2 Write 101 Mixed 57.7 SusWrite 102 56% 76.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 0.9 180% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 42.6% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB 10,715 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 933 MHz Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	45.9% Average	MC Read 20.1 MC Write 12.6 MC Mixed 17.5 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 7.9 SC Mixed 13.2 26% 9.13 GB/s	Latency 77.5 52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,715 samples	148x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 41%, 7,567 samples	68x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 39%, 4,786 samples	61x

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $366

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16