Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 69% Battle cruiser	Desktop 106% UFO	Workstation 65% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	62.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	281% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	52.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201022
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 08 '21 at 12:17
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$152 383,420 User benchmarks, average bench 96% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	99.4% Outstanding	Memory 93 1-Core 160 2-Core 310 102% 188 Pts	4-Core 569 8-Core 942 92% 755 Pts	64-Core 1,192 74% 1,192 Pts
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 99.4% Great: 107%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Asus(1043 8769) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.51 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	62.5% Good	Lighting 81.6 Reflection 80 Parallax 85 66% 82.2 fps	MRender 61 Gravity 78.3 Splatting 62.5 55% 67.3 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 580GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1180 1150 1159 1157 1166 1143 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	281% Outstanding	Read 2,572 Write 1,412 Mixed 1546 SusWrite 1,159 372% 1,672 MB/s	4K Read 67.4 4K Write 81.9 4K Mixed 74 240% 74.4 MB/s	DQ Read 1,289 DQ Write 178 DQ Mixed 338 348% 602 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 281% Great: 410%
WDC WD80EFAX-68KNBN0 8TB 1,186 User benchmarks, average bench 19% 1.5TB free Firmware: 81.00A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 126 123 125 131 124 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	15.5% Very poor	Read 120 Write 123 Mixed 77.3 SusWrite 127 25% 112 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 10.7 4K Mixed 1.5 10% 4.57 MB/s	DQ Read 0.6 DQ Write 3.4 DQ Mixed 3.7 2% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX3200C16D4/32GX 2x31.5GB 2,732 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	99.7% Outstanding	MC Read 43.7 MC Write 24 MC Mixed 38.6 101% 35.4 GB/s	SC Read 31.5 SC Write 24.4 SC Mixed 39 90% 31.6 GB/s	Latency 62.1 64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 99.7% Great: 134%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,530 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 142%

UFO

Desktop 103%

UFO

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

CPU
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $152Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,302x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	616x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	584x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	466x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	381x
RTX 3060Nvidia $279Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	355x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	186x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	151x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	144x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	152x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 88%, 35,395 samples	116x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	106x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 102% - Outstanding

Total price: $687

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16