Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 85% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 82% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	82.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI (all builds)
Memory	22.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190125
Uptime	12.6 Days
Run Date	Jun 08 '21 at 00:58
Run Duration	213 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	29%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	80.8% Excellent	Memory 74.8 1-Core 122 2-Core 244 80% 147 Pts	4-Core 467 8-Core 701 73% 584 Pts	64-Core 1,225 76% 1,225 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Zotac(19DA 1511) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.30 Performing below potential (43^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	102% Outstanding	Lighting 127 Reflection 105 Parallax 136 104% 123 fps	MRender 156 Gravity 122 Splatting 96.9 99% 125 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB 27,887 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 181GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT22B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 205 205 205 200 228 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	82.2% Excellent	Read 477 Write 180 Mixed 257 SusWrite 214 62% 282 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 81.2 4K Mixed 35 130% 47.9 MB/s	DQ Read 272 DQ Write 188 DQ Mixed 221 168% 227 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 133%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 332GB free Firmware: M3CR020 SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 429 432 439 383 398 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 480 Write 423 Mixed 409 SusWrite 416 97% 432 MB/s	4K Read 32 4K Write 84.2 4K Mixed 46.5 153% 54.2 MB/s	DQ Read 390 DQ Write 362 DQ Mixed 297 244% 350 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 125%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 25GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 470 Write 449 Mixed 384 97% 434 MB/s	4K Read 38.2 4K Write 86.3 4K Mixed 51.9 170% 58.8 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 361 DQ Mixed 370 278% 372 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Toshiba Q300 480GB-$152 5,920 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 73GB free Firmware: SAFM12.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 228 260 291 285 198 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Read 475 Write 456 Mixed 352 SusWrite 281 88% 391 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 64.4 4K Mixed 32.3 114% 40.7 MB/s	DQ Read 345 DQ Write 355 DQ Mixed 200 192% 300 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 99%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1TB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 93 93 95 95 94 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	56.5% Above average	Read 103 Write 101 Mixed 93.3 SusWrite 93.8 73% 97.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 67%
WD Elements 2621 2TB 11,378 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 360GB free, PID 2621 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 106 106 106 106 MB/s Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	52.1% Above average	Read 110 Write 98.1 Mixed 73.6 SusWrite 106 130% 97 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 0.3 154% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 64%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 128GB 142 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 118GB free, PID 0747 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 79 79 80 79 79 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	41.9% Average	Read 84.8 Write 77.4 Mixed 51.9 SusWrite 78.9 98% 73.2 MB/s	4K Read 8.1 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 5 316% 5.5 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2Z3200C16 2x16GB 8,563 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	82.8% Excellent	MC Read 33.3 MC Write 26.5 MC Mixed 29.1 85% 29.6 GB/s	SC Read 24.1 SC Write 30 SC Mixed 25.9 76% 26.7 GB/s	Latency 90.8 44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 82.8% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 1,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 97%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 95%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS GAMING 7 WIFI - $276

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	424x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	91x
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $249Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	52x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	79x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	63x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	54x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	43x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	41x

RAM
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	55x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	38x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	34x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $1,069

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16