| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 25.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 84.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Dell Precision T7600 |
| Motherboard | Dell Precision T7600 (all builds) |
| Memory | 5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130809 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 07 '21 at 19:42 |
| Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2687W 0-$1,335
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
|
78.1%
Very good
|
73% 124 Pts
|
63% 534 Pts
|
56% 912 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 466.63
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.4%
Poor
|
26% 32.7 fps
|
24% 30.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
418GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ4.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 420 435 429 431 435 MB/s
|
84.6%
Excellent
|
88% 392 MB/s
|
101% 35 MB/s
|
184% 269 MB/s
|
|
PNY USB 3.1 FD 124GB
28GB free, PID 00ed
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3.6 3.8 5.4 7.1 MB/s
|
6.98%
Terrible
|
14% 13.3 MB/s
|
18% 1.67 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung-00CE M393B5773DH0-YK0 4x2GB
4 of 16 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
|
84.3%
Excellent
|
93% 32.6 GB/s
|
38% 13.3 GB/s
|
61% 65.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Precision T7600 Builds (Compare 692 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Dell Precision T7600
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples | 91x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 76x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 01stBench 67%, 1,642 samples | 75x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples | 39x |
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 36x |
| Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 33x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 23% - Poor | Total price: $109 |