Gigabyte GA-H61MA-D3V

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	24.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H61MA-D3V (all builds)
Memory	7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140225
Uptime	0.5 Days
Run Date	Jun 07 '21 at 07:04
Run Duration	218 Seconds
Run User	GRC-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	76.2% Very good	Memory 91.7 1-Core 96.8 2-Core 190 74% 126 Pts	4-Core 352 8-Core 352 47% 352 Pts	64-Core 365 23% 365 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% MSI(1462 8A90) ≥ 4GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	3.24% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 5 Parallax 1.4 3% 3.43 fps	MRender 4.2 Gravity 4.7 Splatting 3.6 3% 4.17 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.24% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF450000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 109 9.4 19 20 7.2 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	24.9% Poor	Read 214 Write 152 Mixed 74.7 SusWrite 47 27% 122 MB/s	4K Read 15.5 4K Write 9.5 4K Mixed 10.1 42% 11.7 MB/s	DQ Read 19.2 DQ Write 23 DQ Mixed 17 14% 19.7 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130 20,479 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 286GB free Firmware: CC32 SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 118 122 121 120 124 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	67.2% Good	Read 113 Write 114 Mixed 55.7 SusWrite 121 74% 101 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 69%
WD Green 1.5TB (2011)-$51 6,566 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 100GB free Firmware: 51.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 65 65 67 62 65 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	36.9% Below average	Read 64.5 Write 50.3 Mixed 50.5 SusWrite 63.9 42% 57.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 65%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 175GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 49 50 50 50 50 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	28% Poor	Read 47.6 Write 42.5 Mixed 38.2 SusWrite 49.6 33% 44.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 28% Great: 63%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 60,540 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 140GB free Firmware: 0707 SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Read 28.3 Write 27.3 Mixed 27.2 SusWrite 18.9 19% 25.4 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 0.6 169% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 66%
Seagate M3 2TB 1,454 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 158GB free Firmware: 0707 SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Read 29.3 Write 29.7 Mixed 28.5 SusWrite 16 19% 25.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 0.7 198% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 67%
Seagate M3 Portable 2TB 4,943 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 216GB free Firmware: 0710 SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Read 29.4 Write 22.7 Mixed 24.4 SusWrite 16 17% 23.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.3 144% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 64%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 12,078 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 53GB free, PID 0900 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	23.4% Poor	Read 31.7 Write 23.5 Mixed 20 SusWrite 16.3 29% 22.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 0.4 183% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-037.A00LF BKH400UD25608-1333 12GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	42.8% Average	MC Read 14.6 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 13 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.4 SC Write 14 SC Mixed 13.8 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 64.6 62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 42.8% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H61MA-D3V Builds (Compare 246 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61MA-D3V - $160

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	45x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	23x
Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples	16x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	18x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	15x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	13x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	8x
PLUS 480GBSandiskBench 48%, 58,990 samples	7x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	7x
M378B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 47%, 5,657 samples	6x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $247

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16