PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 50.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 39% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8Z68-V GEN3 (all builds) |
Memory | 3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110916 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jun 07 '21 at 00:47 |
Run Duration | 186 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 62% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
57.3%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 460.79
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
50.8%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z22000RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 180 200 196 201 204 MB/s
|
39%
Below average
|
|||
22.2%
Poor
|
||||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$51
93GB free
Firmware: CC49
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 79 72 72 86 84 MB/s
|
24.8%
Poor
|
|||
WD Black 2.5" 250GB (2010)-$50
30GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 72 69 63 76 78 MB/s
|
28.6%
Poor
|
|||
13.3%
Very poor
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
|
41.6%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 247x |
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 194x |
Core i7-2700KIntel $82Bench 73%, 20,692 samples | 92x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 72x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 63x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 60x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $526 |