Razer Blade

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive165% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
1 month ago, 1 month ago.
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DANA_MB
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateJun 06 '21 at 17:12
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User JAM-User
Background CPU 28%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 84
1-Core 111
2-Core 207
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 516
56% 432 Pts
64-Core 646
43% 646 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Cards Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 2001) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6294
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5.09% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 65.6
Parallax 6.7
5% 26.2 fps
MRender 6.3
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 10
5% 7.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.09%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)
Device(1A58 2001) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1670 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.63
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
47.2% Average
Lighting 56.8
Reflection 65.6
Parallax 60.2
46% 60.9 fps
MRender 67.5
Gravity 59.1
Splatting 59.3
49% 62 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 48%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
APS-SE20G-512 512GB
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM13.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 831 690 644 559 621 581 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
165% Outstanding
Read 979
Write 1,268
Mixed 1,025
SusWrite 654
222% 982 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 88.5
4K Mixed 47.9
151% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1052
DQ Write 706
DQ Mixed 783
610% 847 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 165%
Great: 247%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$42
629GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 115 116 120 120 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 62.2
Write 112
Mixed 51.8
SusWrite 117
63% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.1
210% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 70%
Generic Mass-Storage 128GB
51GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 16 17 18 18 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 14.5
Write 16.7
Mixed 15.7
SusWrite 17.2
22% 16 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 2.7
180% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
60.8% Good
MC Read 24
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 19.5
63% 21.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 18
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 5,967 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $239Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $304Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $85SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback