Medion Erazer X5751 D/B704

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMedion Erazer X5751 D/B704  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION Z170H4-EA
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 06 '21 at 16:06
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
76.9% Very good
Memory 90
1-Core 125
2-Core 245
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 343
8-Core 701
61% 522 Pts
64-Core 700
43% 700 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36AA) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
35.1% Below average
Lighting 45.1
Reflection 47.6
Parallax 42.4
37% 45 fps
MRender 37.5
Gravity 42.8
Splatting 37.3
32% 39.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZYTY128HDHP-000L2 128GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT61L1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 87 81 56 43 47 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 408
Write 70.2
Mixed 145
SusWrite 68.6
38% 173 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 26.9
139% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 171
DQ Write 78.6
DQ Mixed 82
72% 111 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 105%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
812GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 78 74 74 81 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 67.5
Write 37.2
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 77.3
43% 58.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
120% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 59%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 201 203 204 204 204 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 183
Write 200
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 203
121% 166 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.1
226% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 111%
Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF2G64AZ-2G6E1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 35.1
MC Mixed 27.9
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 34.6
SC Mixed 24.8
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback