Toshiba Qosmio F60

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 18% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.94% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Toshiba Qosmio F60 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Portable PC
Memory	2.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100217
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 06 '21 at 06:56
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	CHE-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 430 14,318 User benchmarks, average bench 39% rPGA988A Socket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Memory 23 1-Core 16.6 2-Core 30.3 15% 23.3 Pts	4-Core 51.4 8-Core 53.1 7% 52.2 Pts	64-Core 53.4 3% 53.4 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330M 7,697 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Toshiba(1179 0001) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	1.94% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 0.9 Parallax 0.7 2% 1.3 fps	MRender 3.5 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 2.4 2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.94% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 120GB 15,567 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 76GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 92 50 60 55 55 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.8% Below average	Read 216 Write 180 Mixed 185 SusWrite 81.9 37% 166 MB/s	4K Read 13.1 4K Write 21.6 4K Mixed 14.3 50% 16.3 MB/s	DQ Read 117 DQ Write 99.5 DQ Mixed 107 80% 108 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 88%
External USB3.0 128GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 119GB free Firmware: 0204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 23 25 26 25 26 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Read 31.8 Write 26.7 Mixed 28.8 SusWrite 25.3 21% 28.2 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 4.3 788% 4.8 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 6GB 111,301 User benchmarks, average bench 25% null MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	12.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.7 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 5.2 13% 4.57 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 2.8 7% 2.57 GB/s	Latency 299 13% 299 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Qosmio F60 Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Qosmio F60

CPU
Core i7 Q 740Intel $190Bench 54%, 13,278 samples	28x
Core i5 M 430IntelBench 39%, 14,318 samples	16x
Core i7 M 620IntelBench 42%, 9,076 samples	12x

GPU
GeForce GT 330MNvidiaBench 2%, 7,697 samples	70x
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	1x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	3x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	2x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	2x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	24x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	23x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $270

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16