MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive202% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C56
MotherboardMSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56)  (all builds)
Memory29.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201028
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 05 '21 at 17:37
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$310
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 82.8
1-Core 126
2-Core 250
87% 153 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 902
86% 693 Pts
64-Core 1,378
92% 1,378 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD R9 390X-$340
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.4.1
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52% Above average
Lighting 65.2
Reflection 75.5
Parallax 87
53% 75.9 fps
MRender 65.8
Gravity 63.3
Splatting 45.7
51% 58.3 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52%
Great: 59%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$60
244GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211210WD Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 806 432 433 432 430 431 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
202% Outstanding
Read 1,551
Write 1,651
Mixed 1,271
SusWrite 494
278% 1,242 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 69.1
234% 84.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1017
DQ Write 666
DQ Mixed 897
654% 860 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 202%
Great: 237%
Klevv CRAS C710 M.2 NVMe SSD 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: S0614B0G Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1603 1617 1616 1543 1615 1615 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
255% Outstanding
Read 1,417
Write 1,590
Mixed 1,107
SusWrite 1,602
323% 1,429 MB/s
4K Read 46.1
4K Write 161
4K Mixed 39.9
206% 82.4 MB/s
DQ Read 900
DQ Write 910
DQ Mixed 573
522% 794 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 255%
Great: 263%
WDC WDS200T2B0A-00SM50 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 404 412 409 402 406 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 428
Mixed 396
SusWrite 416
98% 434 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 94.9
4K Mixed 48.8
169% 60.3 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 254
220% 325 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 114%
Great: 120%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 153 154 155 155 155 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 144
Write 152
Mixed 82.1
SusWrite 154
97% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
167% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 91%
WD Elements 25A3 12TB
5.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 38.4
Write 39.1
Mixed 33.4
SusWrite 40
52% 37.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 0.8
347% 3.67 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 6.2
DQ Mixed 1.2
254% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 44
MC Write 41.2
MC Mixed 32.7
112% 39.3 GB/s
SC Read 28.4
SC Write 38.5
SC Mixed 33
95% 33.3 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 108%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) Builds (Compare 13,092 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 128%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG B550 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C56) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $1,080
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $320Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $177
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback