Fujitsu FMVXNBNH2Z

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu FMVXNBNH2Z (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU FJNBB06
Memory	2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20190403
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 05 '21 at 15:50
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 580-$250 1,467 User benchmarks, average bench 43% On Board, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	34.7% Below average	Memory 57.6 1-Core 28.3 2-Core 51.8 32% 45.9 Pts	4-Core 71.5 8-Core 73.3 10% 72.4 Pts	64-Core 69.7 4% 69.7 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Fujitsu(10CF 150A) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2555 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.31% Terrible	Lighting 0.2 Reflection 1.3 Parallax 0.2 0% 0.57 fps	MRender 0.9 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.9 1% 0.7 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.31% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTS542525K9SA00 250GB-$30 3,183 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 170GB free (System drive) Firmware: BBFO SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 31 36 38 25 20 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	21.8% Poor	Read 44.8 Write 42.5 Mixed 25 SusWrite 30.9 26% 35.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 117% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 21.8% Great: 31%
USB DISK 32GB 63 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 6GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9 9.5 8.3 7.2 9.7 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	5.52% Terrible	Read 19.3 Write 3.8 Mixed 13.3 SusWrite 9 14% 11.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.52% Great: 19%
SanDisk Cruzer Switch 16GB 3,032 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 10GB free, PID 5572 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 2.5 3.7 3.8 3.5 4 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	10.3% Very poor	Read 29.3 Write 4.3 Mixed 8.5 SusWrite 3.7 12% 11.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1.9 126% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 12%
Mass Storage Device 16GB 765 User benchmarks, average bench 9% 11GB free, PID 125d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 8.5 8.6 8.6 8.4 8.6 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	6.5% Terrible	Read 17.5 Write 8.8 Mixed 8 SusWrite 8.4 13% 10.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.2 33% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.5% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
EE7YG1B1674EU 80CE M471B5773CHS-CH9 4GB 533, 667 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	21.8% Poor	MC Read 7.2 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 9.2 22% 7.67 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 4.7 14% 4.87 GB/s	Latency 135 30% 135 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Fujitsu FMVXNBNH2Z

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)