| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
| Graphics | 133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 27.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190715 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 05 '21 at 04:22 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
93.4%
Outstanding
|
90% 166 Pts
|
97% 813 Pts
|
69% 1109 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
MSI(1462 C725) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
133%
Outstanding
|
148% 203 fps
|
129% 163 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$42
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 58 43 17 55 65 MB/s
|
27.1%
Poor
|
47% 212 MB/s
|
23% 7.77 MB/s
|
13% 16.8 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
340GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 103 116 115 116 117 MB/s
|
59.9%
Above average
|
63% 85.2 MB/s
|
108% 0.73 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Apacer D12.2324CS.001 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
67.4%
Good
|
70% 24.3 GB/s
|
52% 18.1 GB/s
|
53% 75.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,270 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-9700FIntel $295Bench 92%, 54,980 samples | 1,616x |
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,217x |
| Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples | 177x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples | 832x |
| GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples | 481x |
| RTX 2060S (Super)Nvidia $510Bench 100%, 319,148 samples | 429x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 102% - Outstanding | Total price: $438 |