Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 12% Tree trunk	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.05%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	22.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom D525-$250 2,196 User benchmarks, average bench 23% BGA 473, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	9.05% Terrible	Memory 17 1-Core 6.9 2-Core 5.1 8% 9.65 Pts	4-Core 8 8-Core 5.7 1% 6.85 Pts	64-Core 11.4 1% 11.4 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 9.05% Great: 28%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia ION 1,623 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 845E) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.95 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	0.61% Terrible	Lighting 0.9 Reflection 3.9 Parallax 0.3 1% 1.7 fps	MRender 0.8 Gravity 0.3 Splatting 0.3 0% 0.47 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.61% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120 39,518 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 108GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 100 101 134 122 84 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	22.4% Poor	Read 116 Write 116 Mixed 77.4 SusWrite 109 24% 105 MB/s	4K Read 4.9 4K Write 9.2 4K Mixed 10.3 26% 8.13 MB/s	DQ Read 66.3 DQ Write 57 DQ Mixed 53.5 42% 58.9 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4GB 42,830 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 800, 800 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	6.79% Terrible	MC Read 2.1 MC Write 2.4 MC Mixed 3.2 7% 2.57 GB/s	SC Read 0.2 SC Write 0.4 SC Mixed 0.3 1% 0.3 GB/s	Latency 344 12% 344 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 6.79% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 24%

Surfboard

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Atom D525Intel $250Bench 23%, 2,196 samples	9x

GPU
IONNvidiaBench 1%, 1,623 samples	9x

SSD
WDS250G2B0A 250GBWDCBench 88%, 4,642 samples	2x
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	1x
Trion 150 480GBOCZ $300Bench 85%, 13,412 samples	1x

RAM
4GBUnknownBench 26%, 42,830 samples	5x
1x2GBUnknownBench 17%, 99,586 samples	4x

Value: 24% - Poor

Total price: $250

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16