Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 04 '21 at 11:41
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
60.6% Good
Memory 73.8
1-Core 76.5
2-Core 117
55% 89.2 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 455
43% 356 Pts
64-Core 449
28% 449 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36AC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
35.2% Below average
Lighting 45.6
Reflection 46.8
Parallax 42
37% 44.8 fps
MRender 36.5
Gravity 42.4
Splatting 36.9
32% 38.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$250
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 150 179 159 158 143 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
78% Very good
Read 443
Write 254
Mixed 394
SusWrite 164
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 68.4
4K Mixed 43.3
143% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 0.5
DQ Mixed 8.5
36% 88.3 MB/s
Poor: 89%
This bench: 78%
Great: 133%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB
490GB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 134 132 132 132 132 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 131
Write 142
Mixed 72.9
SusWrite 132
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 89%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB
22GB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 126 128 122 107 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 92.1
Write 110
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 124
72% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.5% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 12.8
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 12.9
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback