Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory27.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 04 '21 at 11:41
Run Duration197 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 73.8
1-Core 80
2-Core 150
61% 101 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 520
50% 402 Pts
64-Core 522
35% 522 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36AC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
35.3% Below average
Lighting 45.6
Reflection 46.8
Parallax 42
37% 44.8 fps
MRender 36.5
Gravity 42.4
Splatting 36.9
34% 38.6 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 37%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$288
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 150 179 159 158 143 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
78% Very good
Read 443
Write 254
Mixed 394
SusWrite 164
70% 313 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 68.4
4K Mixed 43.3
143% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 0.5
DQ Mixed 8.5
36% 88.3 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 78%
Great: 134%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB
490GB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 134 132 132 132 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
75.4% Very good
Read 131
Write 142
Mixed 72.9
SusWrite 132
88% 119 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
150% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 91%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB
22GB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 126 128 122 107 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 92.1
Write 110
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 124
72% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
39.5% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 12.8
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 12.9
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 3,520 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $842
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11400F $239Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-10700K $299Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $85SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback