Performance Results


Gaming 127% UFO	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 118% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	157% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Razer Blade Pro 17 (Early 2020) - RZ09-0329 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer DA750
Memory	43.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200917
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jun 03 '21 at 18:28
Run Duration	199 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-10875H 35,361 User benchmarks, average bench 79% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	80% Excellent	Memory 81.4 1-Core 84.6 2-Core 227 72% 131 Pts	4-Core 423 8-Core 684 68% 553 Pts	64-Core 990 61% 990 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 92%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,148 158,856 User benchmarks, average bench 210% EVGA(3842 3987) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 466.11 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	157% Outstanding	Lighting 216 Reflection 194 Parallax 272 176% 227 fps	MRender 254 Gravity 209 Splatting 150 161% 205 fps
Poor: 185% ↑ This bench: 157% Great: 230%
Intel UHD Graphics 187,969 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Device(1A58 3002) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9466 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	5.64% Terrible	Lighting 6 Reflection 8 Parallax 7.2 5% 7.07 fps	MRender 9.5 Gravity 6.3 Splatting 9.8 7% 8.53 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.64% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$130 3,931 User benchmarks, average bench 236% 232GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM22.5 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 941 1244 863 866 660 628 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	187% Outstanding	Read 1,306 Write 1,901 Mixed 1563 SusWrite 867 319% 1,409 MB/s	4K Read 34.3 4K Write 83.9 4K Mixed 52 163% 56.7 MB/s	DQ Read 781 DQ Write 600 DQ Mixed 709 526% 697 MB/s
Poor: 148% ↑ This bench: 187% Great: 322%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$168 138,083 User benchmarks, average bench 416% 1.5TB free Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1894 1892 1892 1905 1908 1897 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	298% Outstanding	Read 2,069 Write 1,872 Mixed 1,837 SusWrite 1,898 432% 1,919 MB/s	4K Read 52.6 4K Write 89.8 4K Mixed 67.2 213% 69.9 MB/s	DQ Read 808 DQ Write 663 DQ Mixed 753 559% 741 MB/s
Poor: 283% ↑ This bench: 298% Great: 526%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BL32G32C16S4B.M16FB1 2x31.5GB 404 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 2 slots used 63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	82.3% Excellent	MC Read 30.3 MC Write 32.5 MC Mixed 25.4 84% 29.4 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 35.3 SC Mixed 24.8 73% 25.5 GB/s	Latency 78 51% 78 ns
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 103%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

CPU
Core i7-10875HIntelBench 79%, 35,361 samples	429x
Core i7-10750HIntelBench 77%, 206,796 samples	6x

GPU
RTX 2080S (Super Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 93%, 3,436 samples	240x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 187,969 samples	116x
GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q DesignNvidiaBench 79%, 8,783 samples	68x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	57x
MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GBSamsungBench 231%, 4,252 samples	52x
MZVLB1T0HBLR-00A00 1TBSamsungBench 254%, 2,748 samples	40x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	188x
NMSO480E82-3200E 2x8GBUnknownBench 80%, 1,277 samples	41x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	36x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16