Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemRazer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DA560
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 03 '21 at 00:05
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
89.2% Excellent
Memory 95.2
1-Core 130
2-Core 256
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 677
70% 563 Pts
64-Core 756
47% 756 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 89.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1A58 2012) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
6.3% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 9.7
Parallax 8.3
5% 8 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 13.1
9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.3%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair MP400 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM53.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 683 993 1904 1970 1959 1950 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 996
Mixed 239
SusWrite 1,577
172% 744 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 70.2
172% 71.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,202
DQ Write 943
DQ Mixed 1,123
826% 1,089 MB/s
Poor: 143%
This bench: 207%
Great: 382%
Nvme CA5-8D512 512GB
477GB free
Firmware: CQ20904 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1953 1139 629 627 623 627 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 1,503
Write 1,917
Mixed 1,371
SusWrite 933
323% 1,431 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 65.9
217% 74.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,255
DQ Write 1,061
DQ Mixed 1,060
821% 1,125 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 236%
Great: 234%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB
806GB free
Firmware: RVQ0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 440 447 454 452 451 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 418
Write 417
Mixed 368
SusWrite 446
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 38.2
4K Mixed 25.9
84% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 100
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 103
77% 101 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2933 C17 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
MC Read 35.2
MC Write 36.5
MC Mixed 29.1
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 39.9
SC Mixed 27.2
81% 28.5 GB/s
Latency 56.6
71% 56.6 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369 Builds (Compare 731 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

System: Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2021) - RZ09-0369

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback