Biostar H310MHP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics150% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar H310MHP  (all builds)
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190531
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 02 '21 at 12:58
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 85
1-Core 120
2-Core 245
83% 150 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 689
74% 589 Pts
64-Core 725
45% 725 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 460.79
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
150% Outstanding
Lighting 219
Reflection 208
Parallax 203
179% 210 fps
MRender 196
Gravity 156
Splatting 139
131% 164 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 150%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Allied 128GB 128GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW190712
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 357
Write 268
Mixed 169
58% 265 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 9.1
4K Mixed 8.3
83% 20.7 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 69.3
DQ Mixed 4.7
46% 113 MB/s
Poor: 27% Great: 87%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
596GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.2% Poor
Read 41.2
Write 41.3
Mixed 40.9
SusWrite 41.7
9% 41.3 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 15.6
4K Mixed 14.4
47% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 29.2
DQ Write 26.5
DQ Mixed 15.3
15% 23.7 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 99%
WD WD20EZAZ-00WGYX0 2TB
173GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 123 127 126 128 127 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 120
Write 122
Mixed 96.8
SusWrite 126
86% 116 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 7.6
4K Mixed 0.7
360% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 101%
WD Elements 2621 2TB
455GB free, PID 2621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 41 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
27.3% Poor
Read 36.7
Write 36.1
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 40.6
48% 35.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.3
157% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 64%
WD Elements 2620 4TB
2TB free, PID 2620
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 94 94 95 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 83.5
Write 95.2
Mixed 68.2
SusWrite 94
117% 85.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905701-131.A00G 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 27
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 33.8
SC Mixed 25.9
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 71.9
56% 71.9 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310MHP Builds (Compare 1,019 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar H310MHP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $271
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback