Dream N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 60% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Dream N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dream N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1
Memory	6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170508
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Jul 19 '17 at 17:35
Run Duration	336 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	16%
CPU Throttled	60%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	57.1% Above average	Memory 75.6 1-Core 53.9 2-Core 106 50% 78.7 Pts	4-Core 211 8-Core 300 32% 255 Pts	64-Core 302 19% 302 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 57.1% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630 310,249 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Clevo(1558 850A) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4678 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.32% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 3.19 Parallax 1.22 1% 1.94 fps	MRender 2.24 Gravity 1.2 Splatting 2.48 2% 1.97 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 1.32% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green SATA M.2 120GB-$47 6,576 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z3311000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 100 58 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 108 (A5) Unknown 100 100 115976765595 (A6) Unknown 100 100 2 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 6 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 3 (AE) Unknown 100 100 46 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 52 47 227633266736 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 219046412339 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 392 (EA) Unknown 100 100 720 (F1) Unknown 253 253 511 (F2) Unknown 253 253 757 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	41% Average	Read 425 Write 123 Mixed 176 52% 241 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 17.6 4K Mixed 3.53 42% 13.3 MB/s	DQ Read 131 DQ Write 85.9 DQ Mixed 3.95 31% 73.5 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 41% Great: 73%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 636GB free Firmware: LVM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 84 67 228061283 (03) Spinup time 99 99 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 164 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 64 60 2576547 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -78189879623591 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 125 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 53 588972067 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 4 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 21 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1490 (C2) HDA temperature 35 47 90194313251 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 -59549721559006 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	61.6% Good	Read 118 Write 96.5 Mixed 67.1 70% 93.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 1.68 4K Mixed 0.46 110% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 71%
Sony Storage Media 16GB 1,582 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 14GB free, PID 05ba Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	6.11% Terrible	Read 21.9 Write 6.17 Mixed 6.06 11% 11.4 MB/s	4K Read 6.68 4K Write 0.007 4K Mixed 0.006 25% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.11% Great: 8%
WD Elements 25A2 1TB 31,808 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 7GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	24.4% Poor	Read 55.8 Write 51.4 Mixed 44.2 64% 50.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.52 4K Write 1.62 4K Mixed 0.23 65% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT8G4SFD8213.C16FADP 1x8GB 57 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	38.3% Below average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 11.3 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 14.2 SC Mixed 12.8 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 89.2 45% 89.2 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1 Builds (Compare 28 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Dream N85_N87,HJ,HJ1,HK1

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	19x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples	9x

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	15x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	10x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	3x

SSD
Green SATA M.2 120GBWD $47Bench 53%, 6,576 samples	11x
MX300 SATA M.2 525GBCrucial $140Bench 85%, 20,154 samples	4x
PX-128M7VG 128GBPlextorBench 69%, 324 samples	3x

RAM
W-MEM2133S48GS 1x8GBUnknownBench 32%, 15 samples	3x
CT16G4SFD8213.C16FBD 1x16GBCrucialBench 41%, 209 samples	3x
CT8G4SFD8213.C16FHP 1x8GBCrucialBench 42%, 144 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 7% - Terrible

Total price: $47

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16