Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	6.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	65.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon W3550 7,649 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Memory 83.1 1-Core 83.9 2-Core 160 65% 109 Pts	4-Core 322 8-Core 406 47% 364 Pts	64-Core 406 25% 406 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000 15,855 User benchmarks, average bench 6% HP(103C 084A) 1GB CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	6.03% Terrible	Lighting 7.1 Reflection 9.5 Parallax 6.6 6% 7.73 fps	MRender 9.4 Gravity 7.9 Splatting 7 6% 8.1 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.03% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 426GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 236 224 234 233 233 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	65.1% Good	Read 207 Write 231 Mixed 208 SusWrite 232 50% 220 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 49.1 4K Mixed 34.2 107% 36 MB/s	DQ Read 205 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 197 148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 65.1% Great: 129%
SanDisk Ultra 32GB 3,832 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 23GB free, PID 558a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 7.1 8 7.5 7.9 7.2 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Read 25.7 Write 16.9 Mixed 20 SusWrite 8.3 22% 17.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.2 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 2.7 172% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 34%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 15,101 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 185GB free, PID a200 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 24 23 24 23 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Read 26.1 Write 24.8 Mixed 18.6 SusWrite 23.2 31% 23.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B5173DB0-CK0 ID:80 CE M378B5173DB0-CK0 ID:80 AD HMT325U7EFR8C-RD ID:80 AD HMT325U7EFR8C-RD ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT325U7EFR8C-RD 50GB 1600, 1600, 800, 800, 1333, 800 MHz 4096, 4096, 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	35.4% Below average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 11 MC Mixed 10.1 33% 11.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 11.4 SC Mixed 10.8 31% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 75 53% 75 ns

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

RAM
ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT125U7TFR8C-H9 42GBUnknownBench 37%, 128 samples	22x
ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT351U7BFR8C-H9 46GBUnknownBench 45%, 108 samples	18x
ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5673FH0-CH9 46GBUnknownBench 46%, 280 samples	16x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $258

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16